1	NYS School Report Card Honeoye Falls-Lima CSD May 2007
2	What’s Reported Demographic Factors Attendance and Suspensions Teacher Qualifications Staff Counts District Accountability (Test Scores) High School Completion Financial Information
3	New Look Color-Coding System Includes Grades 3 – 8 Testing New Benchmarking Comparisons to all NY State Public Schools (rather than Similar Schools)
4	Accountability HF-L “District in Good Standing” 1. Met the 95% participation requirement 2. Met effective AMO and AYP Exam HF-L Students Scoring 3 and 4 State ELA 3 87% 69% ELA 4 82% 69% ELA 5 89% 67% ELA 6 81% 60% ELA 7 84% 56% ELA 8 69% 49% ELA (High School cohort) 90% 69%
5	Accountability HF-L “District in Good Standing” 1. Met the 95% participation requirement 2. Met effective AMO and AYP Exam HF-L Students Scoring 3 and 4 State Math 3 95% 81% Math 4 94% 78% Math 5 92% 68% Math 6 73% 60% Math 7 79% 56% Math 8 76% 54% Math (High School cohort) 88% 71%
6	Accountability HF-L “District in Good Standing” 1. Met the 95% participation requirement 2. Met effective AMO and AYP Exam Students Scoring 3 and 4 State Science 4 96% 86% Science 8 94% 64% 2002 Cohort Graduation Rate 90%
7	DISTRICT FOCUS POINTS: Actions and Initiatives Strong focus on alignment among buildings Alignment with the revised District Strategic Plan Use of nySTART and COGNOS Revised Program Evaluation School Improvement Teams continue to review testing data Superintendent Conference Days used for data analysis and correcting assessments New benchmarking due to revised tests
8	Celebrations We’re “Code Green” in every area! In each area, HF-L students scored well above the State expectations Students with Disabilities in groups large enough to report met SED expectations (HS math, HS ELA, Graduation Rate)
9	Celebrations Very stable, high results at the HS level Within sub-groups: Strong results in Math 3, 4, 5 Improvement in Science 8 among subgroups – special needs and economically disadvantaged
10	Areas for Attention Discrepancies between ELA and Math scores at varying grade levels Addressing needs of “vanilla” kids Within sub-groups: Economically disadvantaged scores fluctuated from test to test Students with disabilities results showed a slight decrease
11	Sample: Math 3
12	Sample: Math 3
13	Continuous Improvement Data analysis and follow up Cohorts, grade levels, and student by student Big picture look at achievement Continued implementation of revised Strategic Plan